Skip to main content
Home
  • Connect!
  • Donate
  • My Account
  • Join/Login
  • S
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
    • What is Social and Personality Psychology?
    • Leadership
      • Elections
    • Get Involved
    • Committees
    • Diversity & Inclusion Initiatives
    • Government Relations
    • Governance Documents
    • Staff
    • Jobs at SPSP
      • Benefits of Working at SPSP
      • Current Openings
  • Members
    • Membership Categories and Rates
    • Member Demographics
    • Member Directory
    • Collaboration Zone
    • APA Division 8
    • Fellows
    • Listservs and Shared Interest Groups
    • Member Deals and Discounts
  • Publications
    • Best Practices
    • Publication Policies
    • Resources
    • PSPB
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation/Submission Guidelines
      • PSPB Online
    • PSPR
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • PSPR Online
    • SPPS
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • SPPS Online
  • Events
    • 2022 Convention
    • Future/Past Conventions
    • Summer Psychology Forum
    • Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists
    • APA Convention (Division 8)
    • Student Opportunities
      • SISPP
      • SPUR
      • EASP
      • EAPP
    • Learning Online
  • Giving
    • Ways to Give
    • Planned Giving
    • Tribute Wall
    • Annual Reports
    • ARP Awards
  • Awards/Grants
    • Annual Awards
      • Senior Career Contribution Awards
      • Mid-Career Awards
      • Early Career Awards
      • Teaching and Mentoring Awards
      • Prizes for a Single Outstanding Contribution
      • Media Awards
      • Service Awards
      • Student Awards
      • Diversity Awards
    • Student Awards
      • Heritage Dissertation Research Award
      • Outstanding Research Award
      • Graduate Student Poster Award
      • Undergraduate Student Poster Award
      • Student Publication Prize
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Diversity Awards
      • Jenessa Shapiro Award for Contributions to Diversity and Inclusion
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Heritage Wall of Fame
    • International Awards
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Legacy Program
    • Travel/Registration Awards
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
      • Teacher & Scholar Travel/Registration Award
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Small Research Grant Program
    • Small Conference Grant Program
    • Community Catalyst Grant Program
  • News
    • Character and Context Blog
    • Member Updates
    • Press Releases
    • Member Newsletter
    • Student Newsletter
  • Resources
    • Connect!
    • Racism, Bias & Diversity
    • Free-Form Fridays
    • Students
      • Graduate Program Directory
      • Applying to Grad School
      • Life in Graduate School
    • Early Career
    • Primarily Undergraduate Institutions
    • Multimedia
      • #SPSPchat
      • SPSP Experts
      • Out of the Lab
      • Convention Videos
    • Funding
    • International Study and Work
    • Statistics & Data Analysis
    • Teaching
      • Recommended Textbooks
      • Syllabi Examples
      • Teaching Aids
      • Video
    • Applied Psychology
  • Careers
    • Find/Post a Job
    • Graduation Outcomes
    • Career Resources
    • Academic Job Market
    • Non-Academic Job Market
    • Undergraduate Research
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
    • What is Social and Personality Psychology?
    • Leadership
      • Elections
    • Get Involved
    • Committees
    • Diversity & Inclusion Initiatives
    • Government Relations
    • Governance Documents
    • Staff
    • Jobs at SPSP
      • Benefits of Working at SPSP
      • Current Openings
  • Members
    • Membership Categories and Rates
    • Member Demographics
    • Member Directory
    • Collaboration Zone
    • APA Division 8
    • Fellows
    • Listservs and Shared Interest Groups
    • Member Deals and Discounts
  • Publications
    • Best Practices
    • Publication Policies
    • Resources
    • PSPB
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation/Submission Guidelines
      • PSPB Online
    • PSPR
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • PSPR Online
    • SPPS
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • SPPS Online
  • Events
    • 2022 Convention
    • Future/Past Conventions
    • Summer Psychology Forum
    • Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists
    • APA Convention (Division 8)
    • Student Opportunities
      • SISPP
      • SPUR
      • EASP
      • EAPP
    • Learning Online
  • Giving
    • Ways to Give
    • Planned Giving
    • Tribute Wall
    • Annual Reports
    • ARP Awards
  • Awards/Grants
    • Annual Awards
      • Senior Career Contribution Awards
      • Mid-Career Awards
      • Early Career Awards
      • Teaching and Mentoring Awards
      • Prizes for a Single Outstanding Contribution
      • Media Awards
      • Service Awards
      • Student Awards
      • Diversity Awards
    • Student Awards
      • Heritage Dissertation Research Award
      • Outstanding Research Award
      • Graduate Student Poster Award
      • Undergraduate Student Poster Award
      • Student Publication Prize
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Diversity Awards
      • Jenessa Shapiro Award for Contributions to Diversity and Inclusion
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Heritage Wall of Fame
    • International Awards
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Legacy Program
    • Travel/Registration Awards
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
      • Teacher & Scholar Travel/Registration Award
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Small Research Grant Program
    • Small Conference Grant Program
    • Community Catalyst Grant Program
  • News
    • Character and Context Blog
    • Member Updates
    • Press Releases
    • Member Newsletter
    • Student Newsletter
  • Resources
    • Connect!
    • Racism, Bias & Diversity
    • Free-Form Fridays
    • Students
      • Graduate Program Directory
      • Applying to Grad School
      • Life in Graduate School
    • Early Career
    • Primarily Undergraduate Institutions
    • Multimedia
      • #SPSPchat
      • SPSP Experts
      • Out of the Lab
      • Convention Videos
    • Funding
    • International Study and Work
    • Statistics & Data Analysis
    • Teaching
      • Recommended Textbooks
      • Syllabi Examples
      • Teaching Aids
      • Video
    • Applied Psychology
  • Careers
    • Find/Post a Job
    • Graduation Outcomes
    • Career Resources
    • Academic Job Market
    • Non-Academic Job Market
    • Undergraduate Research

You are here

Home » News » Character and Context Blog

Character  &  Context

The Science of Who We Are and How We Relate
Editors: Judith Hall, Leah Dickens, Colleen Sinclair

 

Jul 08, 2020

Are Creative Teams More Effective When Their Members Vary in Agreeableness?

by Sean T. H. Lee and Park Guihyun
Group of women discussing creative

Photo by Retha Ferguson from Pexels

Agreeableness is one of the Big Five cardinal personality traits. People who are higher in agreeableness tend to be more collegial and concerned about maintaining positive relationships with others. In contrast, those lower in agreeableness tend to voice their disagreements with other people and are less concerned about maintaining positive relationships.

In the context of work teams, team members who are higher in agreeableness tend to prioritize relational harmony and avoid disagreements with other members.  The upsides of this is that positive working relationships are maintained and member satisfaction is generally high. But the downside is that being highly agreeable may inculcate a climate in which group members are reluctant to share dissenting perspectives and opinions, which may hamper the generation of creative ideas.

On the other hand, team members who are lower in agreeableness are much less deferential and freely air their disagreements without constraint. Although this approach may provide the team with a much wider range of perspectives to work on, it risks breeding a climate of animosity and general negativity that can impact morale and people’s willingness to even work with one another.

In light of these double-edged effects, researchers have suggested that having a good mix of members across the agreeableness spectrum might address this trade-off and promote optimal functioning in creative teams. This suggestion assumes that people with different levels of agreeableness will complement each other and play to each other’s strengths. However, this idea has never been empirically tested.

Our study found that, contrary to popular belief, having a greater spread of members along the agreeableness spectrum was associated with decreases in both team creativity and team member satisfaction. This effect seemed to occur because having members of varying levels of agreeableness heightened both task and relationship conflict.  In other words, having a mix of agreeable and less agreeable members on the same team precipitated both task-oriented and interpersonal conflict, which harmed both the team’s creative performance and the working relationships among team members.

These findings suggest that, instead of playing to each other’s strengths, people with different levels of agreeableness levels may have played to each other’s weakness instead. But, why?

Studies on the social implications of agreeableness have found that agreeableness is easily perceived in other people. People are often very sensitive to how agreeable other people are, and seeing stark differences in agreeableness can engender feelings of being interpersonally incompatible. In addition, people who are higher versus lower in agreeableness differ in how they approach and resolve disagreements with other people.  Agreeable people prefer amicable negotiations, and disagreeable people prefer to dominate discussions.  In our study, such stark contrasts in how members interact and communicate may have led to interpersonal acrimony and hampered development of a shared understanding about how the team should work and function, leading to task conflict.

Our study also found evidence suggesting a vicious cycle between task and relationship conflict in teams that had a broad mix of both agreeable and disagreeable members. As other studies have shown, poor conflict management prevents team members from taking disagreements in stride.  Opposing views are perceived as interpersonal acrimony rather than constructive input, which further aggravates interpersonal discord and prevents team members from being receptive to one another’s inputs. All of this then potentially leads to even greater conflict.

Overall, our findings suggest that it may be best to compose creative teams of members who have similar levels of agreeableness. Our analyses suggest that even teams composed predominantly of lower agreeableness individuals may function more effectively than those with members of varying levels of agreeableness. Perhaps members who are all low in agreeableness may have  been aware of their similarity in being less agreeable, thereby normalizing their less agreeable ways of managing divergent viewpoints and reducing the odds that dissenting opinions would be interpreted as interpersonal acrimony. When groups are composed of people of varying levels of agreeableness, members may not understand or accept each other’s ways of dealing with disagreement, which causes  task conflict and relationship conflict to escalate.  

All-in-all, team managers might be better off focusing their efforts on managing the downsides associated with having members of generally high or generally low agreeableness rather than trying to create teams with a mix of agreeableness.  


For further reading

Lee, S. T. H., & Park, G. (2020). Does diversity in team members’ agreeableness benefit creative teams? Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103932.
 

Dr. Sean T. H. Lee is a recent PhD in Psychology graduate from the Singapore Management University, School of Social Sciences. He studies creativity and innovation, as well as emotions, health, and well-being.

Dr. Park Guihyun is a senior lecturer at the Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, Research School of Management. She studies group processes and team dynamics.

Tags: 
teams
personality
agreeableness
creativity

About our Blog

Why is this blog called Character & Context?

Everything that people think, feel, and do is affected by some combination of their personal characteristics and features of the social context they are in at the time. Character & Context explores the latest insights about human behavior from research in personality and social psychology, the scientific field that studies the causes of everyday behaviors.  

□Learn More
□Contribute a Blog to Character & Context

Search the Blog

Get Email Updates from the Blog

Click below to join the Character & Context mailing list.
Subscribe

Popular Articles

Why Is a Polo Shirt Like a Peacock’s Tail?
Can Feeling Good About Recycling Make Us More Wasteful?
Does Reliance on Merit Principles Lead to Discrimination?
The Magical Aura of Insurance
Why You Should (Not) Stop Thinking About Work While at Home

Share this page
 
Society for Personality and Social Psychology
1120 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 280
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 869-3240
info@spsp.org
Facebook Icon Twitter Icon LinkedIn Icon
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Members
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Awards/Grants
  • News
  • Resources
  • Careers
© 2022. Society for Personality and Social Psychology®. All rights reserved.

View our Privacy Policy here.